All about Web 2.0 Yellow Pages, Local Searchs and community based YP  
Your Subtitle text
Opinions


Business opportunity in community based YP - case study:

A case study we built show that an investment of $300,000 in $1.2M resedents' region will turn into $10M company in 5 years.

Projections show that this model in an average metropolitan, can reach a data-base of 40,000 listings of recommended businesses in about 300 categories and 15 neighborhoods (9 in each category/neighborhood).

Current IYP penetration is 4-6% in customers' based (23% CAGR source Kelsey), in 5 years it will reach 10% (15% customers' based annual growth). We estimate community based YP will reach 4% penetration in 4 years. Pricing will range between $30-80 per month (30-50% of local IYP prices). Total expected income, in such region $2,000,000 (IYP EBITDA - 70%) .

A complete case study we built in Tel Aviv (TA) show that out of the 120,000 businesses that exist in TA 4% will become members and 1% advertisers (relative to 10% penetration of IYP local player) by year 4 of operations. Prices will be 30% of local IYP prices. Total expected income - $2.4M (with EBIDTA of 70%) annually (10-12% of total IYP market).

By using multiplier of 10 the market value – of such operation in TA can become- $10M (>100% IRR).




Does Sponsor links is the right revenue model in Web 2.0 YP ?

Current enhanced listing model (as used in YP and Yelp) to generate revenue is inefficient in community model.

Would anyone click on a 3 stars enhanced business while there is a 4-5 stars business listed just below?

We believe that in community not only the environment should change but also the products and the revenue sources should change. In community model the ranking and transparency are the keys in that matter the enhance listings are less powerful and carry conflict of interests in users minds. Advertisement model shift from the conventional enhanced listing to a mixture of subscription with sponsor links

What impact a promoted business will get if he is ranked badly? And if I’m a highly ranked business do I need to spend money? How this conflict of interest will be resolved in users’ minds? Did the operator prefer paying businesses on non paying businesses, what the impact on the accuracy of my search results as a user?

** BizBee solutions address all those questions with simple solution.

Internet Yellow Pages might change hands and move to Local Media players

This post will try to forecast the direction of the future Internet Yellow Pages players (IYP).  In the last 30 years we had been used to the fact that YP is in fact a monopoly. i.e. gaining market share requires spending significant amount of capital (printing, book distributions …..) that it made no sense to go into battle with the major YP player.  Evident by this dynamic, in most markets the big players held more then 90% of the market.

In the 1990s; with the evolvement of the web, it seems as if some of the main hurdles for competitors have been removed (limited need for printing and distribution) and tha competition will intensify. In parallel consumers came to understand that YP is not the only alternative to find local merchants.

Some of the YP competitors opened vertical indexes (wedding, restaurants….) and were more successful; some tried to confront head to head with the big directories and in most cases fails. Although operational costs were reduced dramatically, those operations who decided to compete head to head with the leading YP players could not survive. The main reason was sales effort. At that time is was very painful to convince a SMB’s  to become a web advertiser. And only YP sales force were capable of going through the long sales cycle due to the fact that they could easily bundle it with the printed sale cycle.

In 2004 the situation changed. SMB’s became aware of the web potential and importance and understood that they need to be there. The only problem was in which media. In many countries it is not a clear case that IYP is the best choice, as Google and other vertical portals suddenly open new fruitful alternatives.

In 2006 the communities entered and reshuffle the cards again. Suddenly consumers are not only open for new alternatives and seek the one that suits them the best, but they are also willing to participate in a joint effort to improve the quality of the YP listings by sharing their experiences. Research says that in the ages of 12-17 more then 50% of the kids are open to share their thoughts, so think of the impact of this dynamic in 10-15 years when they will be 30-35 years old.

This is something that creates significant challenges for traditional IYP. Now the market is not only more open for competitors, but also competitors are challenging their core business model. The market is aiming to change their business model. No more burden on the consumers shoulders--i.e. no more bad businesses which invests a lot of money in the media and gain advantage over the good businesses with maybe slightly less capital.

What do YP players do?

At this point we see the YP players holding their traditional position. They are doing all the necessary (but minimal) things to hold their competitors from entering in. In markets where communities enter they allow people to post reviews, where in other markets they remain in the old IYP concept.

But in this game (i.e. community based YP) not only that they have no advantage they actually have a few big disadvantages:

  1. For years they have been recognized by the users as a closed monopoly . In term of community, being closed and not transparent is a deal killer.
  2. Yellow Pages brand is old with limited appeal among the young web users, thus will have hard time attracting them to join a community that by its nature requires intimate relationship. 
  3. Yelow Pages has conflict of interest because the community based YP can cannibalize the current model (i.e. it requires to allow people to post bad comments on big advertisers)
  4. Yellow Pages is obliged to its legacy, and is less ready for changes For example, YO committed to advertise all businesses, but consumers want to have only the good ones in the community.
  5. Above all I’m personally not sure it will be easy to extend the YP brand to community. Its like trying to extend Toyotabrand to luxury motors

Thus we believe YP will have hard time to manage this shift effectively.

The players that are perfectly suited for this era are the local media companies (TV, radio, newspaper, etc.). The reasons are:

  1. They have intimate relationships with the opinion leaders, which can be a magnet for other community members to join
  2. They reach consumers on a daily basis, (i.e. their media is complementary to the community, and is good for leveraging the vibes created in the community). This means that they can combine publishing their media with the community, which will significantly increase the power of the local community.
  3. They know how to handle users' content , and how to make it easy for readers.
  4. They can leverage their own content to generate awareness for these services and they have seasons with low demand for spots.
  5. The currently manage small Yellow Pages in their medias (specially the printed Local news papers)
  6. And they have no constrains.

We see a lot of Local  Media operators entering the community playground. The question is whether they will have the vision to see the YP opportunity and gain their footprint in this amazing market?

I believe that they will and if they won’t people like me will help them understand this potential J


Yellow Pages media crave for users reviews

This post is about a TV program, which took place in Israel, and was trying to test the quality, professionalism,  and honesty of small Service Providers in the Israeli market.

The idea of the program was to report on “fake” problems in Air Conditions, washing machines, etc. and by hidden cameras to show us (the audience) what really Service Providers provide us with.

Given the lack of trust by consumers, the TV program was obviously a big success. The interesting part, though, is that the the results were even more interesting: 

But before getting to these results, let’s try to analyze what happened to us in the last 3 decades.

People in my age (40s) who did their MBA in marketing during the 1990s learned on Philip Kotler’s philosophy , the world's leading strategic marketer. In his great books he explains how important is marketing and how we can benefits from using these tools. What he missed in his revolutionary insights was the future of those insights after they have been overused.

Marketers had become more important then engineers. Differentiation becomes more about branding then about quality. What is the difference between Sharp and Sony TVs? What is the difference between two Plumbers next to each other in the Yellow Pages books or on Google results?

The answer is that 99% of the population doesn’t know the real answer!!

Philip Kotler’s insights reached the SMB’s in the last 15 years, and the results we are noticing today are both good and problematic ones. On the positive side:

  1. Big spend on advertising: local advertising markets’ annual growth is 2 times higher then the national ad market.
  2. More attention to the presentation of he service (such highly designed web sites, colored advertisement, clearer massage, etc.)

On other hand, the different SMB players looking only at the short term success leading to their brand being worth so little that they can switch identities every year--this obviously pushed marketers to the extreme, to a bad place for the users. 

As one who worked many years with Yellow Pages advertisers, the most common formula that exist in SMB’s space today is “spend more money on marketing (enhanced listing, Ad-Ward etc..) and spend less money on Quality of Service for maximizing earnings.” Some SMBs believing that you can be very rich as long as you pass a very low quality threshold, but spend a lot on marketing—the poorer your service is the richer you will get!!

This is obviously a bad outcome but it is the reality- the final conclusion of the TV show was very much equivalent to our expectations; out of 119 random businesses only 33 were professional and honest. Think about it, only 27% of the businesses you invite to serve you will be ok.

Your chances of getting bad service are 3 out of 4 times--WOW

That is where Web 2.0 Yellow pages have a significant role to play.

 

  Benchmark IYP+reviews (web 2.0 YP) vs. community based IYP

 

 

YP organizations have recently started to build online tools providing the ability for consumers to write reviews on businesses they used. It seems as they think that just allowing reviewers to post reviews together with their strong brand and intensive marketing will encourage users to write content. Our analysis shows that the picture is quite different!

In our analysis we compared two leading YP providers:

  1. YP LA (www.yellowpages.com )  a Yellow pages site with review capability
  2. Yelp LA (www.yelp.com) – a community based Yellowpages

Our study was done in two phases:

1st - We analyzed the visitor and promotion “statistics” of those two players

In term of traffic www.yellowpages.com published that their monthly traffic exceed 33 Million unique visitors in the US market, where www.yelp.com published that they recently reached just 5M unique visitors per month. 1-0 to www.yellowpages.com with 6 times more traffic.

We then checked the two sites for their promotional activity around review generation; this is how it looked like :

            
        www.Yelp.com                                   www.yellowpages.com

                  

Blog2_4Blog3

                                 

So, the final score of phase 1 between those two players is 2-0 to www.yellowpages.com. Both in traffic and in promotion www.yellowpages.com wins big time.

2nd – We took 5 of the most attractive YP categories (Dentist, Movers, Attorney, Florist and Restaurants) and count how many reviews gathered in the first 25 businesses listed in these categories (after all, we felt that number of reviews is a critical metric to measure the success of the review portion of the site).





The results are as follow :

  1. Attorney –  125% more reviews in Yelp
  2. Movers – 220% more reviews in Yelp
  3. Dentist –  740% more reviews in Yelp
  4. Florist –  2% more reviews in Yelp
  5. Restaurant – 1070% more reviews in Yelp

So, as you can see, is the learning here is that while important, absolute promotion spend, brand and user traffic is less attractive for Reviews generators. Community environment is the right solution—without it, traditional YP players will leave a tremendous amount of value on the table and running the risk of continuing to lose significant share to the sophisticated online communities.

Now the question in whether the traditional IYP players have just adopted the wrong strategy, or whether they know the importance of community building, but don’t know how to create it and just try use their current online real estate they have (after all, this will not be a new practice for them J).

 

 

 


 YP advertisement  future in the Web 2.0 era

 

Blog1_4  

  Nilsen research (based on 26,486 web surfers globally) shows that organizations can try to influence people in many forms and ways through different media channels, but as expected the most trustable media is friends (“Consumers opinion”).

In specific countries the trust in friends’ opinions regarding purchasing decisions can reach above 90%, significantly higher than the next closest channel.

Is it good or bad for Web 2.0 YP?

In my opinion it is good for the Operators who will consider this gap between internet reviews that reached only 60% and consumers opinions exceed 90% in the trust index. The winning Web 2.0 YP players will be those that will clearly identify the gap and develop tools (features, site design, etc.) that can help bridge this gap. And this is going to affect the advertisement market. A 3 stars business would no be able to put his ads. next to 5 stars business.

 












The opportunity of Web 2.0 Yellow Pages is here and now
 

In the last 5 years a few additional trends have occurred –

1.      Usage of Internet for SMB’s searchings - The Internet, with an increase of services and broadband penetration, has become a tool that people use on a daily basis for all their needs including searching for local services like plumbers, lawyers etc (Consumer survey  - “broadband access is a key determinant of usage levels of YP”, n=370)

2.      Social Networks awareness - Social networks such as  www.linkedin.com , www.myspace.com  and www.facebook.com   have helped connect people and spread ‘word of mouth’ information and as a result encourage people to take part in such communities and educated them to be involved and to understand the potential values they can get from such environment.

3.      Internet showed that YPs no longer have a monopoly on SMB’s electronic search media - Google and yahoo have become  big competitors for Internet Yellow Pages due to the keyword advertising  model and the penetration of SMB’s to the Internet with web pages.

4.      Traditional Yellow Pages have lost much of their strength - In the past few years, many managements have put their company for sale in order to realize current value as they fear the  long term health of the industry. They suffer from lack of flexibility due to their fears from exterminate their printed cash cow.

As a result we feel the market is ready for a new era of Yellow Pages. A Yellow Pages that is built by communities, who are participating in building a network of information (like traveling books consisting mostly of ‘word of mouth’ information from other travelers) based on members experiences.

Our Web 2.0 YP goal is to elevate some of this burden from the consumer and improve market efficiency.

Traditional YP players or new players that wish to enter this promising market should make their decisions in the very short future.

I will be glad to help :)

 

 

 

Web 2.0 Yellow Pages forecast

 

The Yellow Pages market is a multi-billion dollar market world wide. Our calculations estimate global YP players’ evaluation at the sum of $150 Billion. It currently holds 7% of the total advertisement budget and more then 12% of the local advertisment budget with EBITDA of 55%. In the last 5 years the online media’s market share grew at expected to be 10% of the YP market and enjoy higher margins.

Kelsey group had recently published their forecast to IYP revenue : "The online segment, which comprises IYP and local search advertising, is expected to grow from $4.1 billion in 2006 to $11.1 billion globally in 2011 (22.3% CAGR)"

We expect that IYP face value will grow by $70B in the next 5 years and by 2011 the Intent YP players evaluation will be more than $100 Billion based on the expected EBITDA and profit multipliers.

Web 2.0 Yellow Pages will be in its early stage by 2010 with 5% penetration percentage (compare with 20-25% expected penetration percentage  of IYP) , and with ~45% CAGR

My personal belief  


I believe That Web 2.0 Yellow Pages has the potential to be  the next ‘big thing’ in the small medium businesses local media industry.

The mission is to leveraging the trend of Social Networks on the internet where people share and collaborate their experience and ideas (such MySpace, YouTube,Facebook and other )to bring new era to the old Yellow Pages model.

As the Internet Yellow Pages (IYP) manager and as one who has more then 10 years of experience on the internet I learned that YP’s biggest competitors where friends and neighbors and not other medias. Therefore, I believe now, with the community atmosphere and the infrastructure that available to the users, it is the right timing to build up environment, which will help users, share collaborate and as a resault make their decisions better then ever.

For the last 6 months we have learned the market and built a uniqe model which solve most of users problems and yet provides a solid business model.

Web Hosting Companies